Bad-set posted in Discussion
-
by nicro46
Can anyone tell me if it makes sense in post Thread dozens of cases of Bad-set, Misagnlied, Artifact, Bad image etc. ?
I do not see the 'utility, is already boring find hundreds ...Posted
-
by dudrea
I do it indeed, in the hope that someone look at it and may be drop out the sets...
But I'm not fond of that. If anybody of the team can answer about the pertinence (or the non pertinence) of that...Il could be solve the question 😉Posted
-
by CTidwell3
Yeah, I'm hoping they are working on identifying the misaligned sets and bad_data sets. I'm hoping that the original images are ok and that these common ones we see are just a result of the code they used to break up the larger images into the sets we are evaluating. If that is the case, and they can identify what causes it, they can replace those sets with improved versions we can re-evaluate instead of just removing them entirely.
Also responded to part of the original question here:
Posted
-
by nicro46
Ok, if there was some utility in this, it would be appropriate to add other classification items in the column: What do yuo see here? After Asteroid, artifact, and nothing, so you have collections of homogeneous sets with different problems.
Posted
-
by CTidwell3
This link may then be of interest:
http://talk.asteroidzoo.org/#/boards/BAZ0000001/discussions/DAZ00003xy
Some additional buttons like one to identify a bad data set might be something the team adds at a later point, but I think the primary focus they wanted to have at the start was a simplified interface to flag asteroids.
Posted